Two decades directing creative work: my own studios and forty-four clients, a self-published photography book, commercial video. Then I started designing AI products and shipping them. That combination is the whole pitch: the idea, the craft that renders it, and the build — without a handoff in the middle where the intent gets lost.

Case study 01 · Concept · Campaign · Identity · Art direction
The brand is the plane — and I named it.
Shooting the lead photograph, I pulled a monsoon cloud from my library and began a composite. The identity was born in that composite, and the name came out of it — The Monsoon. The palette was already on the aircraft; the weather was already in the frame.
Case study 02 · Concept · Product design · AI direction
A finance app doesn’t have to feel like a tax form.
Eleven themes, full palettes at verified parity. Making it something you’d want to open is a retention decision, not decoration — the same eye, pointed at a spreadsheet’s job.

Case study 03 · Concept · Systems design · Color science
A photograph becomes the ground the interface sits on.
ARC is the modern skin, and my design. You pick the image and the palette is generated from it, so no two installs look alike — a brand system built to survive being handed to the audience. An insulator holds high tension so it never arcs; ARC is where that energy shows.

Case study 04 · Concept · Brand extension · Photography
The mark goes inside the instrument — and the instrument names the product.
They had a mark. What they didn’t have was a way to look like anything. Never laid on top of the shot — sited inside it, so the tool does a second job. Calipers measure, so the calipers are Testing Tools. A wrench secures, so the wrench is Security. It ran on their site for ten years.

Case study 05 · Concept · Aerial cinematography · Creative direction
Two minutes cut from flights across three states.
I flew it, shot it and cut it. Not a client brief — a body of work flown, cut and scored to its own argument.
Case study 06 · Concept · Design · Photography · Print production
Six panels, three tries at one of them, and no undo.
Two commercially released records for AM-I-AM — photography, sleeve design and print production. The only object on this door you can hold. Everything else here renders; this got cut, folded and glued, so the file has to carry where the blade lands and how far the picture runs past it. The credit is printed on the back of both records, which is why this page quotes it rather than claims it.
Case study 07 · Concept · Advertising · Photograph and copy
Writing to the room the ad gets read in.
Menu inserts for Rakhman Jewelers, running in the Cheesecake Factory — handed to someone already sitting down, mid-anniversary, deciding whether to order dessert. The photography is the part people compliment and the easier half. Writing to the placement is the part that cannot be faked.

Case study 08 · Concept · Consulting · Studio design · Photography
They hired me to build the studio. Then they kept me to shoot in it.
The deliverable was the room — the thing other people would work in after I left. They saw the results and kept me on to shoot some of it too, which is the whole argument for why the room mattered. Polished metal against white is the case where there is nowhere for a mistake to hide.
Case study 09 · Concept · Identity · Brand systems · Art direction
A logo is the easy part.
Thirteen marks, one hand — a gallery, a radio station, a cookbook, a renewable-energy firm, two software products and my own two businesses. The work is deciding what a mark has to survive: a favicon and a trade-show banner, a black ground and a white one. Every one went out on the same sheet with its palette declared as swatches rather than described, so the client approved the colors and the drawing together.
The range, and what it was for
A boutique ad agency, where the layer I loved was always conceptual direction — the idea that drives the execution. Portraiture, weddings, editorial and commercial photography, long enough to self-publish a coffee-table book: the photography, the marketing, the print production and the writing, all done by me. That eye moved into video, and a Part 107 with it. Half a dozen businesses built and run along the way.
None of that is here to say look how many things I can do. Breadth on its own is a warning sign and I'd read it that way too. It earns its place here for one reason: every one of those disciplines is the same question asked in a different medium — is this any good, and how do you know?
Twenty years of asking it. That's the faculty AI hasn't touched. It will hand you a thousand options and hold no opinion about which one is right, and the person who can answer that is doing the only part of the work that didn't just get cheap.
Twenty years, narrated — The Path →Why this matters more than the screenshots
Assembling the evidence on this page should have been a screenshot session. Both times it became an audit, because I read the output and didn't believe it.
A permit document counting a garage as conditioned living space. Every expense in a ledger signed + — money leaving, marked as money arriving. A debt goal reading “$12,293.50 of $1,500.00 — 0%”: two true numbers arranged into arithmetic that can't be right.
Not one of those could fail a test, because not one of them was a calculation. A test cannot know that “conditioned space” excludes a garage, or that a plus sign on a debit is a lie. That takes somebody who knows the domain, reads the result, and refuses it.
The fear nobody says out loud about AI creative is slop — infinite volume with nobody judging it. Judging it is the job I am paid for.
See the working method →The system behind all of it
Everything on this page that involved AI — the products, the interfaces, the copy under pressure — came out of 388 hours across 334 sessions, and at that volume the thing that breaks isn't the model. It's drift. So the way I work became a product of its own: a written operating contract, ten workflows that open and close every session the same way, and 91 automated guards that test the method rather than the output. Two have gone red and were closed the same day, and the page keeps the count visible.
Creative direction and validation turn out to be the same muscle — deciding whether work that looks fine actually is. That is the argument in full on its own page.
The combination is the moat
I'm a creative director with a product designer's hands. Two decades of concept work — a boutique ad agency, a self-published photography book, commercial video, half a dozen businesses I built and ran — taught me to know good when I see it. I've also been at Intel, validating silicon and server hardware: paid to decide whether something is good enough before a customer ever sees it.
Those felt like two careers until I noticed I keep doing the same thing in both — the lab tools above, a finance app I now run my own money on, a renovation suite for my own house. See the missing tool, build the missing tool. AI made that faster. It didn't change the other half of the job, which is refusing an answer that looks fine and isn't.
Twenty years, narrated — The Path →Same work, different order — that door opens on the product decisions. Otherwise: I'm looking for a remote role directing AI creative or AI product work, somewhere the taste and the rigor both get used.
Get in touch Product design door →